Registered providers of social housing prepare their accounts under FRS 102, interpreted for the sector by the Statement of Recommended Practice for Registered Social Housing Providers, the housing SORP. In England the Regulator of Social Housing’s Accounting Direction then adds compulsory analysis and disclosures on top, so a housing association’s accounts are effectively built from three layers: the standard, the SORP and the Direction.

What is the housing SORP and who issues it?

A SORP is sector guidance that supplements FRC standards. The FRC recognises SORP making bodies and requires each SORP to carry an FRC statement confirming that it does not contain fundamental points of principle that are unacceptable and does not conflict with an FRC standard. For social housing the recognised bodies are the National Housing Federation, Community Housing Cymru, the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations and the Northern Ireland Federation of Housing Associations, and the FRC lists the current edition as the SORP issued in April 2026.

The SORP does not replace FRS 102. It explains how the standard’s general requirements apply to things that are common in housing and rare elsewhere: large portfolios of let homes, capital grant, shared ownership, recycled grant and complex group structures. How the underlying standard works is covered in FRS 102 explained.

Why does a registered provider have to follow it?

Section 127 of the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 lets the regulator give private registered providers directions about the preparation of their accounts, so that they are prepared in proper form and give a true and fair view of their social housing activities and of the funds and assets held in connection with them. For profit making providers the direction applies only so far as the accounts relate to social housing activities.

The current Accounting Direction, issued in 2022 and updated in 2026, has effect for periods of account beginning on or after 1 January 2026, with the 2022 version continuing for earlier periods and early adoption encouraged. It defines the SORP by reference to the four federations and refers to SORP 2026 by paragraph. Separately, the Charity Commission’s guidance on exempt charities states that registered providers of social housing must apply the housing SORP, and notes that charitable registered societies, many of which are social housing providers, are registered with the FCA and have no principal regulator.

How are the homes themselves accounted for?

FRS 102 paragraph 16.3A says property held primarily for the provision of social benefits, such as social housing held by a public benefit entity, is not investment property. It is accounted for as property, plant and equipment under Section 17, even though it earns rent. The FRC’s basis for conclusions explains that providing social housing is akin to supplying a service. Market rent properties held by the same provider, or properties held for capital growth, can still be investment property. The general rules are in property, plant and equipment under FRS 102.

Impairment is also adapted. For assets held for their service potential, paragraph 27.20A allows value in use to be measured by the present value of the remaining service potential rather than cash flows, and says depreciated replacement cost may be a suitable model. This makes little difference for a profitable block of general needs homes, but it is central for supported or older stock where rents would never justify the carrying amount. See impairment of assets under FRS 102.

How is housing grant treated?

Paragraph 24.4 of FRS 102 lets an entity recognise government grants under either the performance model or the accrual model, chosen class by class. Under the accrual model a grant relating to assets is recognised in income on a systematic basis over the expected useful life of the asset (paragraph 24.5F). Under the performance model a grant with performance related conditions is recognised in income only when those conditions are met. The Accounting Direction’s analysis of social housing lettings has separate lines for amortised government grants under the accrual model and government grants taken to income under the performance model, so readers can see which approach has been used.

The Direction also requires every provider to disclose the total accumulated financial assistance and other government grant received or receivable on properties owned at the balance sheet date, showing how much has gone to income and how much is held as deferred income. Where grant is recycled rather than repaid, a reconciliation of the Recycled Capital Grant Fund is required, and the Direction says any amount is to be considered material. More on the two grant models is in FRS 102 Section 24: government grants.

Illustration only. A provider receives £500,000 of capital grant towards new homes with an assumed useful life of 50 years. Using the accrual model it releases £10,000 a year to income and, after the first year, holds £490,000 as deferred income. Under the performance model, if the only condition is completion of the homes, the full £500,000 would be income in the year the homes are completed. The same scheme can therefore show very different surpluses depending on the policy chosen, which is why the disclosure split exists.

What does the Accounting Direction add to the SORP?

Large providers, defined as those owning 1,000 or more homes on the first day of the period, must give two analyses:

  • Note A: turnover, cost of sales, operating expenditure and operating surplus, split between social housing lettings, other social housing activities (including first tranche low cost home ownership sales and charges for support services) and activities other than social housing.
  • Note B: income and operating expenditure on social housing lettings by general needs, supported housing and other, with lines for management, routine and planned maintenance, major repairs, bad debts, depreciation, impairment and void losses.

The Direction treats the definition of operating surplus as a key judgement, and lists items that may be presented as operating depending on that judgement: profits or losses on disposal of property, plant and equipment, Gift Aid and revaluation of investment properties. All providers, large or small, must also disclose the legislation under which they are established, the basis of preparation, key management remuneration in £10,000 bands from £60,000 upwards, details of the chief executive’s pension arrangements, auditor remuneration, security given on borrowings, and the number of social housing units owned and managed at the start and end of the period. The narrative report must include value for money reporting and a certification of compliance with the Governance and Financial Viability Standard.

How do group structures and loans affect the accounts?

Many providers trade through subsidiaries that build homes for sale or provide commercial services. The Direction requires a provider that is a parent to prepare consolidated accounts where legislation and standards permit, and requires transparency about transactions with group members that are not registered providers: the basis of any apportionment or recharge, the aggregate amounts, which entities were involved, and any cross guarantees or financial support. Profits passed up by Gift Aid are accounted for as described in consolidating a charity’s trading subsidiary; the FRC specifically mentions registered providers when explaining paragraph 29.14A.

Lending in the sector raised a classification issue. The FRC concluded that a loan cannot be basic if the lender has a unilateral option to change its terms, for example from a fixed to a variable rate, even if the borrower can avoid that by repaying. Such loans fall under Section 12 and are measured at fair value. Pensions can also be awkward: where a provider is in a multi employer defined benefit plan accounted for as defined contribution, paragraph 28.11A still requires a liability for contributions due under any agreement to fund a deficit. Fuller defined benefit accounting is covered in accounting for defined benefit pension schemes.

What mistakes come up most often?

  • Treating social rented homes as investment property because they earn rent. Paragraph 16.3A rules this out where the main purpose is social benefit.
  • Mixing grant models within a class, or failing to explain which model applies in the Note B lines.
  • Omitting the RCGF reconciliation on the basis that the balance is small. The Direction treats any amount as material.
  • Applying the wrong Direction to a period that began before 1 January 2026 without deciding to adopt the update early.
  • Thin intra group disclosure where costs are recharged to a non registered subsidiary without explaining the basis.

Solar Protect provides tax investigation insurance for businesses and fee protection schemes for accountancy practices. Read how our cover works or get a quote.

Related Accountapedia entries

Sources

Reviewed by Christine Anderson, Broker, Solar Protect. Last reviewed 8 October 2026. Part of Accountapedia, the Solar Protect guide to UK tax and accounting. This page is general information, not personalised advice.